Apple warranty policies criticised by European consumer agencies

by Adam Banks on March 20, 2012

Before Christmas, as we reported, Apple was fined €900,000 by Italy’s antitrust regulator, the AGCM, for failing to explain customers’ statutory rights and selling them AppleCare warranties that partially duplicated the vendor’s existing obligations. Now the controversy has spread across Europe. On 19 March, 11 national consumer authorities – via the European Consumers’ Organisation, BEUC – formally called on Apple to ‘halt misleading practices’.

The Italian case centred on the EU requirement for manufacturers to be held accountable for defects in goods for at least two years from purchase. By offering only a one-year guarantee, and charging users extra for an extension to this via AppleCare, Apple was found to have breached the rules as implemented in Italian law.

Although the relevant EU Directive also applies to the UK as a member state, the situation here is a little different. Regardless of any warranty explicitly offered by the manufacturer, our more stringent national laws give consumers up to six years to claim a replacement or refund for products that are found to have an inherent defect. Because of this, the two-year warranty rule has not been incorporated specifically into UK legislation and it remains normal for manufacturers to offer only a one-year warranty, with buyers covered by their statutory rights beyond that time.

Nonetheless, AppleCare appears to duplicate UK consumers’ statutory rights in the same way as in Italy, and it’s hard to see how AppleCare would not fall foul of the UK’s consumer protection legislation in the same way as Italy’s. We’ve asked both Apple and the Office of Fair Trading for comment, and will post any replies we receive.

UPDATE: The OFT tells us it does not comment on individual cases.

For more breaking news and reviews, subscribe to MacUser magazine. We'll give you three issues for £1
  • Alan Gilliland

    I would find it difficult to disagree with this article, but must step forward in Apple’s defense.
    It just so happens the AppleCare warranty in practice is probably the world’s best. ESpecially when combined with ProCare (Genius Bar booking)
    Firstly, unlike many companies, if you have a problem they will talk you through it until it is resolved in most cases, even if that takes days.
    Secondly, let me quote from just one of my personal cases. I bought a 15″ Powerbook Pro around 7-8 years ago. It developed a recurring problem Apple failed to sort out. The final time it occurred was two months out of the warranty period, but as they inspected it at Regent St. they agreed with me it was the same problem as earlier. Tried to fix. Couldn’t.
    They gave me without quibble a brand-new out-that-day 15″ MacBook Pro. I bought a new three year warranty for this free one. In years 2/3 it developed screen problem (fuzzy lines across) and they replaced screen (and keyboard and keyboard topcase without asking) twice.
    Again over a year out of the 3 yr warranty the screen went. They found it was the motherboard/ graphics card (?) and said that would cost quite a bit. On closer inspection they discovered that board/card was from a faulty batch which had a four year warranty and though I was out of that too, they replaced it free of charge.
    It is now working fine – 7.5 yrs intensive graphics use out of one purchase! Now doesn’t that count as a GRADE ONE warranty?

  • Aaaashy

    the OFT does very little in fact

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=511832771 Joe Nash

    I’ve read a few times in your magazine about AppleCare duplicating UK statutory rights for consumers, but it’s difficult to find out what exactly my rights are. Would you say it is not worth paying extra for AppleCare then? I always have for Apple laptops.

  • http://twitter.com/macusermagazine MacUser

    The tech support element of AppleCare is indeed the part that may be worth paying for.

    All of your problems with the 15in MBP were due to inherent faults and were covered by the Sale of Goods Act. If a product develops a fault within its normal lifetime and not due to damage, the supplier must make good or compensate you. Any warranty is irrelevant to this.

    Giving you a brand new machine is beyond the call of duty, so kudos to Apple for that! But replacing a screen that develops a problem within 2-3 years in a premium-priced laptop is just correct practice.

Previous post:

Next post:

>